Double materiality is a concept deeply embedded within the framework of sustainability reporting standards such as those developed by the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) Foundation, including IFRS S1 and the Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB) standards. It refers to the process of considering how sustainability issues affect a company's financial performance (financial materiality) and how a company's operations impact the environment and society (impact materiality).
The IFRS S1 and SASB standards, among others, have integrated the concept of double materiality into their reporting frameworks to ensure that entities provide a holistic view of their sustainability performance. This includes both the financial implications of sustainability issues for the entity and the entity's impacts on society and the environment . The goal is to provide a comprehensive set of disclosures that help stakeholders understand how sustainability-related risks and opportunities are managed and how the entity contributes to or mitigates sustainability challenges. This dual focus enables more informed decision-making by investors, lenders, and other stakeholders, promoting a more sustainable global economy.
Double materiality reporting is increasingly being required in jurisdictions that are focusing on enhancing the transparency and accountability of businesses regarding their sustainability practices and impacts. The European Union (EU) is at the forefront of implementing double materiality through its regulatory frameworks, particularly in the following initiatives:
Outside of the EU, the concept of double materiality is being recognized and incorporated into reporting standards and frameworks globally, albeit at varying degrees and under different terminologies. Organizations such as the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) and the International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB), which is part of the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) Foundation, are working towards harmonizing sustainability reporting standards that encompass the principles of double materiality. However, the adoption of double materiality in reporting requirements varies by country and is less explicit outside of the EU.
The push for double materiality reflects a broader shift towards integrated reporting, where companies are expected to provide a holistic view of their financial and non-financial performance, including environmental, social, and governance (ESG) factors, to better inform investment decisions and policy making.
See examples of double materiality: